• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java


  • Subject: Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java
  • From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 08:59:35 -0700

On Friday, May 11, 2001, at 01:09 AM, Tyler LaGrange wrote:

Java is a much smarter choice if you would like to find reference materials and other snippets to add to your code. On amazon.com we can see 1571 listings for Java, and 17 matches for Objective-C, most of which aren't even relative. fatbrain.com has 1168 books for java, and 8 for Objective-C - only half really relevant

Very smart choice: as Lenin said, "Quantity has a quality all of its very own."

I'm reminded of one of the sig lines of Matt Meiske, one of the Mac placement gurus at Scientific Placement:

***DOS Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq, Tandy,
and millions of others are by far the most popular, with about 70
million machines in use worldwide. Macintosh fans, on the other hand,
may note that cockroaches are far more numerous than humans, and that
numbers alone do not denote a higher life form.
-- New York Times, 11/26/91

--
_Deirdre Stash-o-Matic: http://weirdre.com http://deirdre.net
Macintosh Developer (seeking work): Will work for Cocoa
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by."
- Douglas Adams


References: 
 >Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java (From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java
  • Next by Date: Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java
  • Previous by thread: Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java
  • Next by thread: Re: FW: Objective C vs. Java
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread