• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon?


  • Subject: Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon?
  • From: Clyde McQueen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 16:39:26 -0700

> From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <email@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 14:09:41 -0700
>
> The problem is that the paradigm you're looking for isn't there: it's
> simply not the same beast.

After perusing this list for a few days, I've seen the same issue over and
over: is it a Mac, or a *nix box? It seems to me that:

1. If you want file behavior like a *nix box, use Cocoa as-is.

2. If you want file behavior like a circa-2000 Mac, use Cocoa with a
sprinkling of Carbon to smooth over the rough spots.

My question is: why not use a little Carbon to get at the old Mac behaviors?
Is there a performance penalty? Does the app get bigger? Or is it just a
pain in the arse?

/Clyde


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon?
      • From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon? (From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Programmatically changing the mouse scaling
  • Next by Date: Re: NSSound
  • Previous by thread: Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon?
  • Next by thread: Re: Volume Tracking in Cocoa without Carbon?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread