• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI)


  • Subject: Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI)
  • From: Brian Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:33:54 -0500

On Friday, May 18, 2001, at 12:29 AM, mmalcolm crawford wrote:

I hope that these rather long posts might have given some folks out there a flavour at least of what EOF is about, and why it is perhaps rather unfortunately named. "Enterprise" objects may not sound as if they have a great relevance to the Macintosh marketplace (at least not yet ;-) , but I hope anyone should be able to see the benefits of a Persistent Object Framework, and why some of us would so dearly like to see it retained in Cocoa.

And I haven't even mentioned the EOInterface framework yet... if it's not too cruel to ask, perhaps Brian might explain the loss he's feeling at the moment?

mmalc.

Boy, where to start.

I'm the 'computer guy' at a small/medium sized business. On MacOS 8/9, I used a lot of different '4GL' database tools, FileMaker, 4thDimension, HyperCard, Visual FoxPro, even looked at Omnis.

Invariably, I'd end up running into a wall that ALL 4GL tools lead to -- the famous, "While 4GL tools make easy tasks easier, they make difficult task impossible." In other words, if what you wanted to do didn't fit the 4GL designer's idea of how things should work, you were usually stuck.

On the other hand, I'd also written several PowerPlant C++ Mac database apps to connect to database servers (like ButlerSQL or PrimeBase), and while I had complete freedom to implement things as I wished, I had to do everything myself. Lots and lots of embedded, brittle SQL statements. Changing or renaming a column in the database would require about the same amount of advance planning as the WWII invasion of Normandy.

Then I came upon OSX Server 1.0.2 and EOF. For the first time, as a Mac developer, I felt I had an advantage in writing the sort of database applications that are so common in business, and so commonly done in VisualBasic on the other side of the fence.

With EOF and Interface Builder, you can literally create a simple (and even not-so-simple) database client application WITHOUT really writing any code at all! Drop a database entity from EOModeler onto the nib, layout the form widgets, text fields and buttons, control drag the connections, click 'build' -- you're done.

I finally had the best of both worlds -- the speed of using a 4GL RAD database tool, and the power and flexibility of writing it from scratch.

As an added advantage, and a huge one at that, if we wanted to switch database server platforms, for the most part, I only had to open up the EOModel, switch the EOAdaptor to the new server platform, and recompile. We've switched backend database servers 3 times here as we've grown. I haven't had to touch the code in my EOF/Cocoa apps any of these times (only the EOModels).

Nothing else on the planet touches EOF/Cocoa for writing database client apps -- nothing. Not Visual Basic, not PowerBuilder, not FoxPro. Not even close.

Even better, since EOF abstracts the database 'model' from the GUI, I could also use the same model objects and 'business logic' in a web program. GUI clients for the data-entry intensive tasks, Web interfaces for the rest of them, all from the same codebase.

Unfortunately, this option evaporated between last January and the release of WO 4.5.1 for MacOS X last month. EOF/Cocoa is quite broken on OSX, you can't create EOF interfaces in Interface Builder, and there doesn't appear to be any sign (at the moment) of it getting fixed at some point. It appears that it was meant to work (we were told it would work), but it doesn't.

I'm not going to whine about this too much on this list, to keep from angering the list-moms, but suffice it to say that the loss of EOF/Cocoa GUI apps won't probably even be appreciated by most Mac developers until they decide to start writing those little database client apps that all businesses (large or small) seem to need. Even graphic design shops need accounting and billing systems, right?

Not to mention what would have been possible if EOF had been included as part of the OS, like on OSX Server 1.x. Think of a cross between HyperCard/RealBasic/FileMaker all backed up with a 'plug and play' database backend that could scale from text files to Oracle. Sound useful?

Anyway, speaking as a former MacOS 8/9, now Mac OSX developer, I'd just like all of the other MacOS 8/9 developers to be aware of what's being lost with the disappearance of EOF/Cocoa. It was, quite simply, the competitive advantage in writing small business software of any kind.

Brian



email@hidden http://personalpages.tds.net/~brian_hill
___________________________________________________________
"Why? I came into this game for adventure - go anywhere, travel
light, get in, get out, wherever there's trouble, a man alone.
Now they've got the whole country sectioned off and you can't
move without a form. I'm the last of a breed."
-- Archibald "Harry" Tuttle, Rogue HVAC Repairman
___________________________________________________________


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI)
      • From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI) (From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Programmatically adding separator to NSPopupButton?
  • Next by Date: Re: Error codes?
  • Previous by thread: Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI)
  • Next by thread: Re: EOF (was Re: Cocoa CGI)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread