• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Mutability
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mutability


  • Subject: Re: Mutability
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 23:44:56 +0100

Rosyna,

>>>>>> Rosyna (R) wrote at Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:33:25 -0700:
R> >It's not _my_ array object, it's _Apple_ array object. (Im)mutability and
R> >proper disctinction of them very definitely *SHOULD* be behaviour of it,
R> >but alas from OS X 10.0 up it is not, due to the CoreFoundation mess.
R> >That's exactly what we are in this thread speaking of.

R> It's documented that it's because of CoreFoundation?

More or less. It's documented that and (in some extent) how CF "objects" are
tollfree bridged with Foundation objects. It's not (AFAIK) documented that
CF uses _one_ class for both mutable and immutable Foundation classes (which
are therefore dummy and not working correctly), but from the simple test code
I've sent it's obvious.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
2K Development: email@hidden http://www.2kdevelopment.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Mutability
      • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Mutability (From: Gregory Block <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Mutability (From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Mutability (From: Rosyna <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Mutability
  • Next by Date: Re: Mutability
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mutability
  • Next by thread: Re: Mutability
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread