Re: java
Re: java
- Subject: Re: java
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:30:53 +0100
jorge,
>
>>>>> jorge herrera (jh) wrote at Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:21:55 -0500:
jh> if Java is used in Cocoa is not portable isn't? We don't have Cocoa
jh> classes in windows, how portable is that? why not compiled to native
jh> code?
Since it would take some effort to add the support. The effort would be
completely wasted, though, since there is not any reason on earth to use Java
instead of ObjC but portability. If you don't need the portability, just use
ObjC -- it's ways easier and more flexible than Java.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz
2K Development: email@hidden
http://www.2kdevelopment.cz
private email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz/oc
References: | |
| >Re: java (From: jorge herrera <email@hidden>) |