• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: java
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: java


  • Subject: Re: java
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:30:53 +0100

jorge,

>>>>>> jorge herrera (jh) wrote at Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:21:55 -0500:
jh> if Java is used in Cocoa is not portable isn't? We don't have Cocoa
jh> classes in windows, how portable is that? why not compiled to native
jh> code?

Since it would take some effort to add the support. The effort would be
completely wasted, though, since there is not any reason on earth to use Java
instead of ObjC but portability. If you don't need the portability, just use
ObjC -- it's ways easier and more flexible than Java.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
2K Development: email@hidden http://www.2kdevelopment.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc


References: 
 >Re: java (From: jorge herrera <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: java
  • Next by Date: Re: Little problem with NSFormatter way of working
  • Previous by thread: Re: java
  • Next by thread: Re: java
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread