• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
[Semi-OT] Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Semi-OT] Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework


  • Subject: [Semi-OT] Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 18:43:31 +0100

On Wednesday, September 5, 2001, at 02:44 pm, Marcel Weiher wrote:

The only problem would be for Carbon/CFM programs that have trouble linking to Mach-O binaries, but this has very little to do with Foundation/CoreFoundation and can be worked around.

Well, you can get around that using CFBundle. It enables you to get function pointers by name, and it's in CarbonLib so any CFM programs can link against it.

-- Finlay


References: 
 >Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework (From: Marcel Weiher <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
  • Next by Date: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Previous by thread: Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • Next by thread: Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread