• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework


  • Subject: Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • From: Marcel Weiher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:44:43 +0200

On Wednesday, September 5, 2001, at 02:31 PM, Chad Jones wrote:

Foundation and CoreFoundation though they have similar names and most of the calls have similar names the two are very different. The two are two separate frameworks which except for their apparent similarities are two separate frameworks.

Probably the largest difference is that Foundation is a Cocoa-only set API calls (can't be used from carbon, command-line etc.)

This is not correct. Foundation can be used essentially from anywhere that any other C library can be used. I've been using it for command line programs for ages, as well as web-apps (with and without WebObjects) etc.

The only problem would be for Carbon/CFM programs that have trouble linking to Mach-O binaries, but this has very little to do with Foundation/CoreFoundation and can be worked around.

Furthermore, Foundation is an API with a public specification (the OpenStep specification) and at least two freely available and portable implementations: libFoundation and gstep-base, both of which are being used in professional environment/shipping applications. CoreFoundation, on the other hand, is an Apple-only API. I tend to view it as exposing the usually private implementation of a foundation.

Incidentally, I just ported my MPWFoundation (including HOM) to Linux/i386 yesterday using libFoundation, one of the two freely available Foundation implementations. There were some mismatches, but really only for advanced parts of the code where I dig deep into the runtime (of course, this also revealed that much of that could probably be simplified...) After that, the XML-Kit and basic Postscript interpreter took less than 1 hour each.

where as CoreFoundation can be used by all types of programming on OSX. Also, the type of objects the two use are very different because of the compatibility difference between the rest of the system.

Er, the objects are supposed to be exactly the same, or am I misunderstanding you here?

Regards,

Marcel

--
Marcel Weiher Metaobject Software Research & Development
Get HOM at <http://www.metaobject.com/downloads/Objective-C>


  • Follow-Ups:
    • [Semi-OT] Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
      • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
References: 
 >what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework (From: Chad Jones <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Clearing Browser Selection
  • Next by Date: Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • Previous by thread: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • Next by thread: [Semi-OT] Re: what's difference and relationship between CoreFoundation and Fou ndation framework
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread