Re: Dynamic Languages [was: Re: why Obj-C]
Re: Dynamic Languages [was: Re: why Obj-C]
- Subject: Re: Dynamic Languages [was: Re: why Obj-C]
- From: Nat! <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 00:45:16 +0200
Am Dienstag den, 9. April 2002, um 00:07, schrieb John C. Randolph:
On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 07:46 AM, Thomas Lachand-Robert wrote:
I hope we all can use Objective-C forever...
I don't!
I've been using Obj-C for about ten years, and it's been great,
but I'm more than ready for something better. Tom looks
interesting, but until someone rewrites the AppKit in Tom, or
there's a way to bridge TOM to Obj-C, it's not really an option.
The successor to Obj-C might be a language that has Marcel's HOM
built-in, it might be something that looks more like LISP or
Smalltalk, or it might be heavily aspect-oriented or declarative.
As long as it's still C underneath, fine by me :)
this, BTW.) I want to keep my source code in a fully relational
database, where I can say "build the app as it was last
Wednesday", or "use the November 12 baseline, except for these
five classes I'm working on".
Ugh, code in the database. Not for me please.
Nat!
P.S. Thread scheduled for termination, by follow-ups to talk :)
------------------------------------------------------
Some people drink deep from the fountains of life, and
some just gargle. -- DLR
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.