• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How viable is Cocoa development?


  • Subject: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:04:37 +0000

On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 10:45 PM, Ondra Cada wrote:

Troll or not, in the context it is, I guess, quite right: whilst almost
complete Cocoa (but some news like sheets or drawers) is totally portable to
anywhere GNUStep is available, *NO* Carbon-specific service is available
outside of Mac.

Neither is AppleScript, not to mention Quartz, NetInfo, DirectoryService, IOKit, QuickTime... The list goes on. These are all very nice technologies specific to OS X... Is that a reason not to use them? Or do you group anything with a non-Obj-C API that is part of OS X as "Carbon"? :-P

-- Finlay


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
    • Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
      • From: Matt Judy <email@hidden>
    • Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
      • From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: How viable is Cocoa development? (From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Previous by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread