• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How viable is Cocoa development?


  • Subject: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • From: Sandy Martel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:25:16 -0500

On Saturday, January 26, 2002, at 10:56 AM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:

Virtual PC is most definitely an emulator. Classic is akin to WINE on Linux, and WINE stands for "Wine Is Not an Emulator".

Emulation is taken to imply emulation of a different chip architecture, whereas Classic is generally termed a "compatibility layer" or something like that.


WINE is a re-implementation of the win32 API on another system, classic is not that (Carbon is). Classic emulate the hardware in which a complete Mac OS 8 or 9 run. (did I say emulate?)

Anyway, everyone know that classis does not emulate the cpu but it sure does emulate other part of the hardware.

Sandy.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
      • From: Chilton Webb <email@hidden>
    • Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: How viable is Cocoa development? (From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by Date: Small problem with NSBrowser
  • Previous by thread: Re: Classic (was: How viable is Cocoa development?)
  • Next by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread