• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)


  • Subject: Re: [LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)
  • From: Eric Ridge <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 18:46:35 -0500

On Saturday, January 26, 2002, at 06:14 PM, <email@hidden> wrote:

<snip>

3b) If I shipped a Cocoa or Carbon App and Apple stopped shipping
Cocoa or Carbon
support with OSX, is it *possible* for me to provide a
functional application environment
without Apple's help.

It's been my understanding that the uses of Cocoa and Carbon were pretty clear. If you have an existing (pre OS X) application and need to get it running on OS X _quickly_, use Carbon. If you are starting from scratch, use Cocoa.

My summary of this thread:
Cocoa *is* viable. Very viable. For now.

eric


References: 
 >[LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?) (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Changing the mouse icon over a button
  • Next by Date: Re: Weird calculation
  • Previous by thread: [LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)
  • Next by thread: Re: [LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread