Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- Subject: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- From: Rosyna <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 09:58:22 -0700
Then the packages wouldn't show up as such on Mac OS 9. That's not
very portable if you alienate your current user base.
Ack, at 7/4/02, Ondra Cada said:
Or any other known one (rtfd, eg.). Well, the very existence of the
bundle bit is another Mac OS X bug: the packages should be
recognized by their suffixes only, as it always was in NeXTStep --
for the very reson you pointed out: it's portable.
Nevertheless, losing a bundle bit is an utterly unimportant trifle.
Such a bundle will work still without any problem; only it'd be
shown as a folder in Finder.
--
Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Holy Knight/Always needs a hug
Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insanely Great People
---
Please include any previous correspondence in replies, it helps me
remember what we were talking about. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.