Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- Subject: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 14:49:26 +0200
On Thursday, July 4, 2002, at 05:00 , Dan Crevier wrote:
Totally, since they are just folders and nothing else.
Don't you have to set the bundle bit on the folder (SetFile -a B <folder>
)
if the extension isn't .app or .bundle?
Or any other known one (rtfd, eg.). Well, the very existence of the bundle
bit is another Mac OS X bug: the packages should be recognized by their
suffixes only, as it always was in NeXTStep -- for the very reson you
pointed out: it's portable.
Nevertheless, losing a bundle bit is an utterly unimportant trifle. Such a
bundle will work still without any problem; only it'd be shown as a folder
in Finder.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.