• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa's Popularity
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa's Popularity


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa's Popularity
  • From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 17:52:39 +0100

Am Samstag den, 23. Mdrz 2002, um 05:21, schrieb Matthew Lehrian:

On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 10:20 PM, Hsu wrote:

Why has Apple let so many powerful tools die off? I'm not talking about the
Finder, or DPS->Quartz but more on the lines of


EOF

Alive and well as part of WebObjects


Where is WebObjects and EOF for Objective-C? Without it, Cocoa has no viable multi-tier architecture solution. If the plan is truly to kill off WO/EOF for Objective-C, then Apple should at least supply tools to generate "Obj-C-EJB-proxy" objects, so Cocoa clients could seemlessly access EJB easily. Maybe Apple should buy OAK (Objective-C CORBA implementation) and integrate it into Cocoa. Maybe Apple should provide a DO interface from WebObjects so Cocoa clients could access EJB's as Objective-C Distributed Objects - this would tie Cocoa clients to WO (instead of being able to access any EJB container) but at least there would be a possible solution.

This is a HUGE PROBLEM. This makes Cocoa UNUSABLE for multi-tier applications and kills the potential reusability of the multi-tier architecture. I couldn't even consider using Cocoa in a corporate setting because of the lack of multi-tier architecture possibilities. This is a shame because of the speed, power and efficiency of Cocoa development tools.

I'm working on a project that I had originally intended to use WO (before Obj-C was dropped) and have a Cocoa and a web client. Now, I'm FORCED to ABANDON Apple's technology, which I REALLY LIKE, because Apple doesn't appear to be very interested in this market.

I really don't want to use Swing for the client application just because I really prefer Objective-C and Cocoa, but Cocoa's simplicity is CRIPPLED HORRIBLY by not being able to play in multi-tier architectures.

I'm currently exploring using MICO CORBA and Objective-C++ to achieve this functionality. If it works, I'm going to explore writing Objective-C bindings for MICO. Maybe this is a good open source project opportunity. Anyone interested?

Everybody who wants to have EOF back should file a bug report with Apple. If there are enough people requesting this, Apple might reconsider its decision.

Ranting here on the list doesn't help much

greetings, Lars
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Cocoa's Popularity
      • From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Cocoa's Popularity (From: Matthew Lehrian <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: double precision errors and numbers not adding correctly
  • Next by Date: [Maybe a little OT] Launching a CFM executable through code
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa's Popularity
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa's Popularity
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread