Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
- Subject: Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
- From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:28:51 -0600
- Organization: EMB & Assocites Inc.
Many people would be satisfied with an EOF that only supports the flat-file
database previously supplied by NeXT. Database bindings are not the
essential feature. Generic object persistence is the essential feature.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Bumgarner" <email@hidden>
To: <email@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:16 AM
Subject: EOF (was [objC retain];
>
Or how about:
>
>
[databaseVendors
>
pleaseProvideNativeDriversEvenThoughYouHaveNoBusinessReasonTo];
>
>
>
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 01:33 AM, cocoa-dev-
>
email@hidden wrote:
>
>
>> Can you do this again please? This time with a snappy slogan regarding
>
>> EOF...
>
>>
>
b.bum
>
....lying there snoring,
>
breath smelling like a 1948 buick.
>
_______________________________________________
>
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.