Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
- Subject: Re: EOF (was [objC retain];
- From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:23:43 -0500
Of which, EOF sucks for general object graph persistence unless your
object graph is connected by nothing but direct relationships and arrays.
If all you have is a hammer, all the world's problems start looking like
nails...
I don't want to flag this particular dead, rotting, maggot infested,
thoroughly pounded equine any more than it already has been and-- if it is
to be flogged-- this is not the right forum.
b.bum
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 10:28 AM, Erik M. Buck wrote:
Many people would be satisfied with an EOF that only supports the
flat-file
database previously supplied by NeXT. Database bindings are not the
essential feature. Generic object persistence is the essential feature.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.