• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #665 - 14 msgs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #665 - 14 msgs


  • Subject: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #665 - 14 msgs
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 20:55:43 -0400

It is equally possible to create ones that choke Preview and not Acrobat. I've found complex tex arrangements can totally destroy Preview's rendering, but remain good in Acrobat. I have several examples on my hardrive.

Owen Anderson
On Monday, May 20, 2002, at 08:11 PM, Kirk Kerekes wrote:

From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>

[much ado about Quartz vs DPS snipped]

- Adobe Acrobat is much faster at rendering arbitrary PDF than Preview. I
can only guess why :(


Actually, I find that on the same box, the performance is roughly comparable -- and Preview will correctly display every PDF that I have thrown at it, while Acrobat Reader will not.

The perceived speed difference has more to do with rendering mechanics -- Adobe renders in front of you, while Preview uses the standard offscreen buffer scheme, and so delivers only the completely rendered page.

It is comparatively trivial to generate PDFs that Acrobat chokes on, and Preview renders perfectly -- just use AppleWorks to create a page with half a dozen or so good-sized shape-gradient fills on it, underneath text and other feature-laden graphic objects, thus generating rather complicated clipping requirements. "Print" the resulting document to PDF, and then view it on Acrobat and Preview. Preview invariably renders the image correctly, Acrobat will start quietly dropping image elements as the complexity goes up -- and without notice, too.

That said, I do hope that Apple restores EPS rasterizing (or at least automagic eps->pdf conversion) to OSX -- I wouldn't wish attempting to install GhostScript on anyone but a devoted Unix fan, FINK or no FINK.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #665 - 14 msgs (From: Kirk Kerekes <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: continuous spell checking
  • Next by Date: Font panel over modal dialog
  • Previous by thread: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #665 - 14 msgs
  • Next by thread: Talking to storage devices...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread