• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: metallized interface (offtopic rant)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: metallized interface (offtopic rant)


  • Subject: Re: metallized interface (offtopic rant)
  • From: Angela Brett <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:09:21 +1300

- Minimise button. What purpose does that serve that wasn't served by window shading?

It gets the window completely out of the way. I remember on OS 9 windowshading a whole lot of windows and then still having to move their title bars around to get them out of the way.

- Toolbars too damn big.

Which is probably why we need a convenient way to hide them ;) Or you could show them just as text, which would confuse any poor Windows user who happened across your computer because they'd think they were menus and probably not expect them to do anything when clicked on (though some things in Windows menubars do, so perhaps it wouldn't be such a shock.) Hey, I'll have to try that trick some time.

Actually, I'd go as far as to say that all the UI elements are now too big. I didn't buy a 19" monitor so my toolbars could take up more space, dammit.

I'll agree with you there. Well, sort of. I think the big UI elements would be great on a 19" monitor or larger... the pixels are getting smaller so using more of them means we can still easily see what things are, and in more detail than before. I've tried turning the resolution way up on other computers (not on OS X) and it's pretty damn difficult to see anything so I'm glad if OS X makes higher resolutions usable. However, I have a clamshell iBook with an 800x600 screen, which is only just big enough to fit all the menus of some apps since the menu font is bigger than it used to be. I wish I could make some things smaller for this screen, but I think I'd be quite happy with them the way they are if I had anything bigger.

Sadly, I think we are going to see more and more divergence from good UI design, and more and more metal interfaced crap, more and more skinnable apps, until we are as bad as windows (or, god forbid, X-Windows windowmanagers like enlightenment/sawfish/etc - have you _seen_ some of those horrible skins?).

I don't think so. Apple gives us two kinds of window, and one kind of every other widget, so it's easy to use those and difficult to use anything else. With Windows it seems as though you get a different widget set depending on how you compile the project or something, and on X-Windows... well, there's no single window manager so there's no hope of making your app look like every other unless the user has a near-identical skin for each one. On Mac OS X, we use Aqua, and if Aqua changes then our apps change with it without us having to do anything, so everything's forced to be consistent unless we either put a lot of effort into making it inconsistent or use textured windows. I've only seen one skinnable app for OS X (Netscape 6) and I don't use it. It's no good having an app which can look like anything I want except the rest of my OS.

Well, that defense doesn't have much to do with metal windows. At least the different style was put there deliberately, with some guidelines for use, instead of just being there as a result of disorganisation and/or much mind-changing. It would be better if there were more rigid guidelines of when to use metal though, and if Apple stuck rigidly to those guidelines. When I used to have real-world calendars and address books, they were made of paper. TVs, stereos, cellphones etc are plastic. Having said that, the Address Book in 10.2 is far, far nicer than the one in 10.1, and I don't mind it being metal at all. I like the metal look in practice but not so much in theory. I don't like inconsistency, but this is only one element which there are only two forms of... that's barely noticeable compared with other OSs where every element has at least three forms. Mac OS has the most consistent GUI I've seen.

At 3:54 PM +0100 1/11/2002, Andreas Mayer wrote:
What's the real world counterpart of iChat? (Uses multiple windows too.)

I wondered that at first, but then I realised we do have instant messaging in the real world... cell phones and pagers.
--
Angela Brett email@hidden http://acronyms.co.nz/angela
A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems -- Paul Erdos
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
References: 
 >Re: metallized interface (offtopic rant) (From: Simon Stapleton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Emptying an NSTextView
  • Next by Date: Re: Emptying an NSTextView
  • Previous by thread: Re: metallized interface (offtopic rant)
  • Next by thread: Re: metallized interface (offtopic rant)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread