• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?


  • Subject: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:14:57 +0100

On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 08:51 , Bill Cheeseman wrote:

their behavior is different from that of functions. A 10.2 app that
calls new 10.2 functions will run under 10.0 and 10.1 if you branch around
them using a system version test.

You quite sure you are speaking of *functions*?

You can send any message to anything, but functions are linked-in just the very same way global variables (used most often for constants) are.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
      • From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? (From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: lost connections, IB to PB
  • Next by Date: Re: A comment and question about rendezvous...
  • Previous by thread: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • Next by thread: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread