Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
- Subject: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
- From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:37:18 -0500
on 02-11-11 4:14 PM, Ondra Cada at email@hidden wrote:
>
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 08:51 , Bill Cheeseman wrote:
>
>
> their behavior is different from that of functions. A 10.2 app that
>
> calls new 10.2 functions will run under 10.0 and 10.1 if you branch around
>
> them using a system version test.
>
>
You quite sure you are speaking of *functions*?
>
>
You can send any message to anything, but functions are linked-in just the
>
very same way global variables (used most often for constants) are.
Yes, functions. Not methods; not macros. Tested every way from Sunday by me
and others. Confirmed by Apple engineering and several developers on this
list. Including one today who tested it because he didn't believe me at
first.
It turns out they are not loaded the same way by dyld. I don't know why.
--
Bill Cheeseman - email@hidden
Quechee Software, Quechee, Vermont, USA
http://www.quecheesoftware.com
The AppleScript Sourcebook -
http://www.AppleScriptSourcebook.com
Vermont Recipes -
http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/VermontRecipes
Croquet Club of Vermont -
http://members.valley.net/croquetvermont
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.