Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
- Subject: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
- From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:07:19 +0100
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 07:35 PM, Bill Cheeseman wrote:
on 02-11-09 10:40 AM, Marco Scheurer at email@hidden wrote:
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 11:17 AM, Bill Cheeseman wrote:
The bottom line, as I understand it, is that an application using C
constants that are new in 10.2 will not launch in 10.1.x or earlier.
Checking the system version to branch around them will not work,
because the loader tries to load them all at once, up front.
Is that true? The following code, in a category of NSTextField,
compiled on 10.2 does not break on 10.1.x (text field is not rounded).
I was careful to refer to "C constants" in my post, but not careful
enough.
I should have said "external" constants, whether they be C or
Objective-C. I
don't see one of those in your examples, but only a typedef with
enumeration
cosntants. [...]
That makes sense, I was suspecting that this difference was based on
the definition of "C constant".
Thanks,
Marco Scheurer
Sen:te, Lausanne, Switzerland
http://www.sente.ch
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.