Re: Cocoa WebObjects
Re: Cocoa WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Cocoa WebObjects
- From: Kevin Callahan <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:07:13 -0800
I wonder how many developers on this list
a) want/need EOF/ObjC
b) would contribute more apps, more quickly to the platform if they had
EOF/ObjC
I for one.
Kevin
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 02:19 AM, Giulio Cesare Solaroli
wrote:
At 12:15 13-11-02 -0800, Jeff LaMarche wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 12:11 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
It's nothing new, EOF/Cocoa has always been possible with WO. The
main issue here is you need to buy a license for WO for each copy of
your app that you distribute, which probably isn't feasible for most
circumstances.
So, there isn't any technical obstacle to EOF/Cocoa outside of
WebObjects, it's simply a strategic decision to make it a WO-only
tool??? That's lame.
http://developer.apple.com/mkt/swl/agreements.html#cocoaeof
The anchor is wrong (it points just where the #webobjects anchor
points), but if you scroll the page just a little down you can see
"Cocoa EOF Runtime Preview Evaluation License".
I don't know how old or dated this information is, but it still
available on Apple site.
The funny situation is that one of the reasons why the Objective-C EOF
was laid behind was the problem of finding native drivers for
accessing the different DBs. Now, even Oracle itself has native SQLNet
drivers for MacOSX!!!
Not to mention FrontBase, that has been always very aggressive on
adopting new Apple technology; Sybase is on the wagon too.
Giulio Cesare Solaroli
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.