Re: Carbon vs Cocoa
Re: Carbon vs Cocoa
- Subject: Re: Carbon vs Cocoa
- From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:23:14 -0500
Well, Carbon apps tend to run faster, easier to port from other OS's
when your source is already in C++, and they support Mac technologies
like aliases far more natively than Cocoa. On the flip side, Carbon
apps can be less stable, don't have the Cocoa "for free" features, and
are much harder to write.
Charles
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 10:14 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
What are the reasons why anybody would choose to right Carbon apps
over Cocoa. Is it because Carbon works under OS 9 with CarbonLib? Or
is it simply a matter of language
choice ie. Objective-C vs C++?
Why for instance are so many of Apples iApps written with the Carbon
APIs?
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.