Re: Carbon vs Cocoa arguments
Re: Carbon vs Cocoa arguments
- Subject: Re: Carbon vs Cocoa arguments
- From: Jonathan Hendry <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:23:05 -0400
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 09:36 America/New_York, Ondra Cada wrote:
On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:51 , Eugene Lee wrote:
Cocoa is generally SLOWER than Carbon,
This is *NOT* true.
Frankly, the most prominent Cocoa apps I have on my iBook are
also the slowest apps I have.
iCal is a horrendous, bloated dog. Unaccountably - it does far less than
Pencil Me In did, but is much slower and RAM-hungry.
Mail is awfully slow. The new Preview is slow. ProjectBuilder is a bit
slow.
OmniWeb is slow, unfortunately.
I'm starting to wonder if using a lot of frameworks kills performance,
somehow. Or maybe excessive use of multithreading?
I don't think it's due to the Objective-C runtime. I don't think it's
purely
due to the dirty-rectangles thing, because non-graphical processing is
also very slow.
Something just ain't right in the bowels of Cocoa these days.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.