• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )


  • Subject: Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )
  • From: Kevin Callahan <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:42:16 -0700

I wonder how many applications are NOT coming to Mac OSX platform
because EOF isn't available?

By leveraging EOF, small shops of 1 -3 people can put out some
compelling applications. I think Apple is hurting itself and the
platform by not providing this great technology. Hell, it's sitting
there on the shelf collecting dust. Make it open-source if they're not
going to let us have it. Please!

I have 3 apps in mind which would leverage EOF, but I don't have time
to build them any other way. So, they're not going to get built.
How many others out there thought EOF/ObjC was going to be part of
their toolset?

Kevin

On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 01:53 PM, Chris Hanson wrote:

> At 2:48 PM -0400 10/14/02, Douglas A. Welton wrote:
>> I have a question: As much as this topic comes up, why hasn't some
>> commercial software vendor jumped in to fill the hole left when EOF
>> was
>> re-positioned without Objective C? Are these vendors simply leaving
>> money
>> on the table?
>
> Commercial vendors aren't stepping up with EOF replacements for
> several reasons. The biggest reason is the investment required to
> actually develop the EOF replacement. A framework equivalent to EOF
> will cost quite a bit to develop.
>
> Apple already *has* this framework. It just needs to be polished and
> shipped. That's what's so darned frustrating for a lot of people;
> Apple is just *sitting* on technology that will enhance their business
> by enhancing our businesses.
>
> I know lots of people in the Apple rank-and-file really want to see
> Cocoa EOF live again. The problem is that Apple's management just
> doesn't see why. Anyone with contacts in Apple management should be
> working them to get this out of the vault and into customer hands > ASAP.
>
> -- Chris
>
> --
> Chris Hanson | Email: email@hidden
> bDistributed.com, Inc. | Phone: +1-847-372-3955
> Making Business Distributed | Fax: +1-847-589-3738
> http://bdistributed.com/ | Personal Email: email@hidden
> _______________________________________________
> cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>

- Kevin
o#?
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )
      • From: "Brian E. Howard" <email@hidden>
    • Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )
      • From: Don Yacktman <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) ) (From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: OT: shutdown items
  • Next by Date: Re: Updated dev. documentation
  • Previous by thread: Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )
  • Next by thread: Re: EOF - was (Cocoa Books (was New to Cocoa) )
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread