• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Binary Differencer/Patcher for OS X?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Binary Differencer/Patcher for OS X?


  • Subject: Re: Binary Differencer/Patcher for OS X?
  • From: Dietrich Epp <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:45:16 -0700

On Friday, Apr 11, 2003, at 06:31 US/Pacific, Ben Dougall wrote:

GPL'd software isn't completely unusable for commercial projects -- there's no clause in the GPL that says "you can't use covered software commercially," or that says "you can't make money off of covered software," despite what many people opposed to the GPL would have you believe.

separate but connected question:

would including a gpl'd app within your bundle constitute separate from your app? that's a gpl'd app still self contained, not actually mixed with your code, just included within the bundle, rather than installed somewhere else on the drive.

i would have thought that'd be absolutely fine, but some people have given me the opposite impression.

from an outside point of view, it would appear to be incorporated, but you wouldn't have to go into it too deeply to realise the two are separate.

The application is one piece of executable code. The GPL'd program is another piece of executable code. They are independent - you can run one without the other.

I see a lot of people have questions about free software. Note the section in the FAQ labeled "Combining work with code released under the GPL".

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html

============================================================
GPL Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Section 3)

[...]

a)Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange;

[...]

If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

============================================================
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Binary Differencer/Patcher for OS X? (From: Ben Dougall <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: NSProgressIndicator won't disappear!
  • Next by Date: Re: Newbie: NSString and debugging question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Binary Differencer/Patcher for OS X?
  • Next by thread: Re: Binary Differencer/Patcher for OS X?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread