Re: Backwards compatibility
Re: Backwards compatibility
- Subject: Re: Backwards compatibility
- From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:29:41 -0400
on 03-08-15 2:57 PM, Dustin Voss at email@hidden wrote:
>
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 06:30 AM, Jeff LaMarche wrote:
>
>
> I've got a Cocoa program compiled using GCC3 on 10.2 with the latest
>
> (non-beta) developer tools. I've got a few users on 10.1 reporting
>
> that it doesn't work for them. I'm almost 100% that I haven't used any
>
> 10.2-specific functionality, so I'm wondering how I can compile a
>
> version that will run on 10.1. I don't have a machine with 10.1 to use
>
> to test.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know what steps can I take to produce (on 10.2) a binary
>
> that will run on 10.1? Will switching to GCC 2.9 do it? I don't have
>
> any frameworks linked other than Foundation and Cocoa, and am not
>
> using any of the new features added in 10.2.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts are appreciated. TIA.
>
> Jeff
>
>
If you set a compiler flag (in your target settings) like so:
>
-DMAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED=MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_1
>
and recompile, you'll find out for sure what 10.2 stuff you're using.
You also want to be sure that your nib files are not saved in 10.2 and later
format.
--
Bill Cheeseman - email@hidden
Quechee Software, Quechee, Vermont, USA
http://www.quecheesoftware.com
The AppleScript Sourcebook -
http://www.AppleScriptSourcebook.com
Vermont Recipes -
http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/VermontRecipes
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.