• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt


  • Subject: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt
  • From: Thanh Ly <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 12:04:53 -0400

Forgive me if I'm not doing this right, I'm not use to using mailing lists. I'm still reading through all your messages regarding my article.

First I just want to express my frustration of being a Switcher. I'm getting a lot of flak from long time Mac users because of my PC background. More specifically to the topic at hand, Cocoa vs. Qt, it's just a matter of taste. My target audience for that article is Linux developers more so than Mac developers. Put yourselves in my shoes, you've been working with Cocoa for however long that you have, now what if you were faced with a situation where you had to learn Windows programming, or Linux programming. This is just hypothetical so bare with me. You'd still feel a sense of attachment to your old style of programming would you not? It doesn't matter if the new dev environment is better or easier to learn, it's all about style and comfort.

I will agree that Cocoa is fun and easy to use for development. But my personal preference is still C++. In spite of the hurdles I'm going up against - lack of an IDE (although I am now able to use Project Builder to build Qt apps), distribution issues (Qt as a shared lib is 6.5 MB, static linking will make my app bloated) - using Qt still makes more sense for _me_ and I can work faster with it.

I hear a lot of people saying that Cocoa is much better, etc. It's all subjective. Well, no one can deny that it's better in the sense that it's native to OSX. Same goes for UI look and feel issues. People have different opinions on that. I rather like the way Qt apps behave and they seem to have brought that behavior with them to OSX. A consistent UI look/feel for cross platform apps is essential. A business man would say "what ever gets the job done faster is better." A programmer would say "what ever makes efficient programs is better." I am first and foremost a programmer. I like to code and I like to have the option to choose how I want to code. Upon reading more messages from this list's archive, I see some people who don't seem to understand that just because something works great for you, it doesn't mean it will be great for everyone. Simply put, Qt is just another option available to developers and I happen to like it and it works great for me. But like I said, just because I like it doesn't mean you have to.

Regards,

-Thanh Ly
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt
      • From: "M. Uli Kusterer" <email@hidden>
    • Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt
      • From: Danny Swarzman <email@hidden>
    • Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt
      • From: Jeff Harrell <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: awakeFromNib and windowWillLoad : basic question
  • Next by Date: EOF: Dead or Alive?
  • Previous by thread: Re: awakeFromNib and windowWillLoad : basic question
  • Next by thread: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread