• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL


  • Subject: Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL
  • From: Robert Palmer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 18:49:33 -0400

What you are missing is that Apple is, first and foremost, a HARDWARE company. The software is there to sell the HARDWARE (iDVD is a prime example - you can only use iDVD if you have an internal DVD writer). If apple were to license YB, that would only promote the competitors hardware.

Now, that said - the scene is changing a bit - iPODs are hardware for both platforms. It would make business sense for Apple to release a framework that allowed developers produce products that would integrate nicely with the iPOD. Oh, yeah, they have already started - they released APIs and sources for Rendevous, for ANY platform, and they released reference designs for Firewire, etc.

Apple will release cross platform development environments only if it promotes their hardware. Remember, Apple is a hardware company.

Robert Palmer, Jr
email@hidden

On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Jeff Harrell wrote:

On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 02:38 PM, Marcel Weiher wrote:

Not going to happen. When Apple made the promise of YB/Win, I never could figure out what the business case for that, apart from a sudden urge to satisfy suicidal tendencies.

Uh. The business case is to allow Apple and Apple developers to write applications that can be deployed on Windows, and to give Windows developers an API through which they can write applications that can be deployed on the Mac.

The first one is key for things like iTunes, and the second one is good for everybody. Windows programmers get a better toolkit, and Mac users get the benefit of more applications.

The business case seems clear. What am I missing?

--
email@hidden
http://homepage.mac.com/jharrell
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL
      • From: Jeff Harrell <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL (From: Jeff Harrell <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: [way OT] Re: GPL and other licenses (was ANN: XML Marshalling for Objective C on OS X)
  • Next by Date: Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL
  • Previous by thread: Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL
  • Next by thread: Re: TrollTech releases QT for Mac under GPL
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread