Re: State of Cocoa adoption
Re: State of Cocoa adoption
- Subject: Re: State of Cocoa adoption
- From: Mark Eaton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:40:27 -0800
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 06:52 AM, publiclook wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 07:31 PM, Greg Titus wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 03:18 PM, publiclook wrote:
Are there any substantial new projects or is the who Mac OS X
software field too mature and or stagnant for substantial new
projects ?
Anyone with a substantial new project is really unlikely to announce
it until it is near (or entirely) complete. And how could the OS X
software field possibly be "too mature" or "stagnant" when OS X
itself is so new?
Perhaps because the field is full of 800 pound competitors like
Microsoft, Adobe, and Apple ? I am not saying that is a bad thing.
More pertinently, I would expect anyone who is adopting Cocoa at this
point to not make much fanfare about it. Its just a toolkit. I don't
expect developers to make any fanfare about what compilers, debuggers,
or graphics editors were used to develop their product :-) As Apple
makes it easier and easier to integrate Cocoa into existing codebases,
I'm sure developers will use Cocoa more.
-mark
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.