• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Harbinger or anticlimax? [maybe a little OT]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Harbinger or anticlimax? [maybe a little OT]


  • Subject: Re: Harbinger or anticlimax? [maybe a little OT]
  • From: Jeff LaMarche <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 10:23:42 -0500

On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 01:18 AM, email@hidden wrote:

Now WO is written in Java.

If Apple had not converted to Java, people would have stopped taking WO seriously. From a business perspective, it was a no-brainer. Pushing Objective-C when Java had clearly won the corporate mindshare battle would have been swimming against the current. It was a political necessity, even though there were clearly some things lost in the transition. There were, however, also some gains; there is a lot more existing Java source code available.

There are no good UI solutions for Java. Java GUIs SUCK EGGS.

That's a pretty sweeping statement to make based on writing one lovely little data modeling tool. I'm no fan of writing Java GUIs, but I can't say with any certainty that there's nothing out there. It seems like somebody must have written a tool similar to IB for Java. If not, then somebody certainly should, it's a huge opportunity.

Besides that, THERE IS NO EOF for Cocoa. So I can't take Apple seriously on either front. You can't easily write CRUD apps in Cocoa, and Cocoa is incompatible with WO.

Ummm... when I installed WO on my machine, it added an EOF Cocoa application template. It would be nice if EOF were available to Cocoa separate from WO, but to say that there is no EOF for Cocoa isn't accurate.

Apple could have ruled the enterprise. They HAD the best tools. Not anymore. FUMBLE. No synergy. Just crap.

No. Having the tools does not equate to winning the battle, and sticking with the tools they had had, they never would have ruled the Enterprise. No CIO or CTO would have selected a non-Java based application server package, no matter how good it was. Java, J2EE, Web Services - these are all buzzwords that get the foot in the door right now. They've personally allowed me to get WO used in a few places that were relatively anti-Apple.

No Apple (or Java) in my enterprise. Too flakey.

Ta ta. Have fun with .net.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Multiple windows
  • Next by Date: creating a window
  • Previous by thread: Harbinger or anticlimax? [maybe a little OT]
  • Next by thread: Re: Harbinger or anticlimax? [maybe a little OT]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread