• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes


  • Subject: Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
  • From: Martin Häcker <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:18:28 +0100

In any case, I tend to think that having both ZeroLink and Unit testing is not such an interesting option. One good practice of Unit Testing is to make sure that all your tests pass when you make changes in the code. Now if you break on a failed test, fix the code, and continue, you would have to rerun all the tests that passed before your change anyway. IMHO it means that it's much simpler to let the tests run, make your changes, rebuild and retest everything.

Ups, did I mix this up? I thought ZeroLink was the technology that speeds up the fix, build, run cycle while "Fix and Continue" whas this whacky stuff I don't really need?

cu Martin
--
dont.wanna.tell
[ot]coder - hehe
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
      • From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes (From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Regex lib for NSString ?
  • Next by Date: Re: Reading file permissions
  • Previous by thread: Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
  • Next by thread: Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread