Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
- Subject: Re: ZeroLink and dynamic discovered Classes
- From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:13:47 +0100
On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 07:18 PM, Martin Hdcker wrote:
In any case, I tend to think that having both ZeroLink and Unit
testing is not such an interesting option. One good practice of Unit
Testing is to make sure that all your tests pass when you make
changes in the code. Now if you break on a failed test, fix the code,
and continue, you would have to rerun all the tests that passed
before your change anyway. IMHO it means that it's much simpler to
let the tests run, make your changes, rebuild and retest everything.
Ups, did I mix this up? I thought ZeroLink was the technology that
speeds up the fix, build, run cycle while "Fix and Continue" whas this
whacky stuff I don't really need?
No: I mixed this up, sorry.
Marco Scheurer
Sen:te, Lausanne, Switzerland
http://www.sente.ch
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.