• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Encryption
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Encryption


  • Subject: Re: Encryption
  • From: Robert Tito <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 01:20:27 +0100

Hello Nicko,

While 128 bits encryption is pretty safe when used in transactions that last
1-3 seconds its not when using corporate e-mail

Please read the most recent proceedings in the scientific literature that
proves what I am saying.

regards


On 2-1-2004 0:46, "Nicko van Someren" <email@hidden> wrote:

> On 1 Jan 2004, at 23:00, Robert Tito wrote:
>> How well meant your advice is, and a happy new year to you, it doesnt
>> give
>> you status 4 in encryption, meaning top secret government level. It
>> takes a
>> mere 15-20 minutes to crack any single 128 bits engine so I think you
>> have
>> either NO knowledge about encryption and or forensic research.
>> Verisign for
>> instance is one of the least safest way to encrypt: the man in the
>> middle is
>> always possible, how hard they try to prevent it.
>>
>> Believe me, we have an engine that will take you 1 over 10^1256
>> attempts to
>> crack: good luck.
>> 128 bits is cracked in no time at all.
>
> That's odd. I've spent half my professional life as the CTO of an
> major publicly traded encryption company and somehow I had never
> noticed that all the published cryptographic research in the world is
> wrong and you're right...
>
> To date the largest symmetric encryption key publicly broken by brute
> force is a 64 bit RC5 key. It took a distributed effort of thousands
> of computers most of a year to do so. Breaking a 128 bit key is 2^64
> time, or about 18.4 million million million times harder. While
> conspiracy theorists might think that this is breakable by the spooks
> the vast majority of opinion is that this is sufficient for most
> applications.
>
> Nicko
> _______________________________________________
> cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Encryption
      • From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>
    • Re: Encryption
      • From: Nicko van Someren <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Encryption (From: Nicko van Someren <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: KVO/KVC compliance, signature for -validate<Key>: error:
  • Next by Date: Re: Encryption
  • Previous by thread: Re: Encryption
  • Next by thread: Re: Encryption
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread