Re: Zerolink as a default option
Re: Zerolink as a default option
- Subject: Re: Zerolink as a default option
- From: "M. Uli Kusterer" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:59:42 +0200
At 9:38 Uhr -0500 16.09.2004, Steve Bryan wrote:
I'm certain that I have arrived late to this particular conversation
but I'd like to know if this insidiously dangerous "feature" is still
a default option. Putting in a feature that produces code that only
works correctly on the developers' machine as a default option seems
incredibly wreckless.
Actually, it may cause wrecks.
Whether it is a good idea at all is another
discussion but making it default just seems like a bad joke.
Actually, it isn't. Because if you look at build styles, you'll see
that the "deployment" build style forces ZeroLink to off. So, if you
use things as they were intended to be used, you'd distribute
deployment builds only, and it'll work and run without ZeroLink.
OTOH, while developing you get the flexibility and speed of
ZeroLink. ZeroLink actually makes the app compile and come up
noticeably faster (at least on my measly old Mac) and also makes
development faster if you use "Fix and Continue".
--
Cheers,
M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..."
http://www.zathras.de
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden