Re: NSTableView Restoring State
Re: NSTableView Restoring State
- Subject: Re: NSTableView Restoring State
- From: "Phil Dow" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:57:44 +0000
Already checked, according to the nib the option will be ignored on OS versions prior to 10.4. As far as I understand that, it means the option should not alter table view behavior in any way under 10.3.9. Thinking that this may have something to do with the problem, at awakeFromNib I am calling the table's setAutoresizesAllColumnsToFit method passing YES, but only if the user is running 10.3.9. This does not alleviate the problem.
-Phil
>
-------Original Message-------
>
From: I. Savant <email@hidden>
>
Subject: Re: NSTableView Restoring State
>
Sent: 01 Dec '05 13:50
>
>
Phil:
>
>
Check out the "Nib" tab in your nib in Interface Builder. Look at
>
the "Oldest Target" section. I think the uniform resizing option is
>
10.4 only, but I may be mistaken; I know 10.4 adds some things to
>
NSTableView but I'm too lazy to look up what those are exactly. The
>
docs will help you there. ;-)
>
>
--
>
I.S.
>
>
>
On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:56 AM, Phil Dow wrote:
>
>
> I am compliing an application in 10.4 but allowing it to run on
>
> 10.3.9. The application includes an NSTableView which I am setting
>
> up in IB. For the resizing mode, I am selecting the uniform
>
> resizing option. I have set an autosave name for the table. Most
>
> but not all of the table's columns can be resized. Columns can be
>
> added and removed as needed, which I accomplish by retaining the
>
> columns in my controller's awakeFromNib and then using starting
>
> table view add and remove methods as needed.
>
>
>
> When a user changes the width of a table column and the quits the
>
> application, the table column's width is preserved, as it should
>
> be. That is, however, only the case in 10.4. Under a 10.3.9
>
> environment, if a user changes the width of a column and then
>
> restarts the app, the changes are lost. Column reordering is
>
> preserved in both 10.4 and 10.3.9, but in 10.3.9 when a column is
>
> moved, say, from position 2 to position 1, the column takes on the
>
> width of the column that had been in position 1.
>
>
>
> Is there some kind of bug that prevents a table setup in 10.4 IB
>
> from properly functioning in 10.3.9?
>
>
>
> -Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> 40gmail.com
>
>
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden