Re: NSTableView Restoring State
Re: NSTableView Restoring State
- Subject: Re: NSTableView Restoring State
- From: "I. Savant" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:10:38 -0500
Hmm ... I'm out of ideas then. ;-) That was my first (and only)
thought on the subject.
--
I.S.
On Dec 1, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Phil Dow wrote:
Already checked, according to the nib the option will be ignored on
OS versions prior to 10.4. As far as I understand that, it means
the option should not alter table view behavior in any way under
10.3.9. Thinking that this may have something to do with the
problem, at awakeFromNib I am calling the table's
setAutoresizesAllColumnsToFit method passing YES, but only if the
user is running 10.3.9. This does not alleviate the problem.
-Phil
-------Original Message-------
From: I. Savant <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: NSTableView Restoring State
Sent: 01 Dec '05 13:50
Phil:
Check out the "Nib" tab in your nib in Interface Builder. Look at
the "Oldest Target" section. I think the uniform resizing option is
10.4 only, but I may be mistaken; I know 10.4 adds some things to
NSTableView but I'm too lazy to look up what those are exactly. The
docs will help you there. ;-)
--
I.S.
On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:56 AM, Phil Dow wrote:
I am compliing an application in 10.4 but allowing it to run on
10.3.9. The application includes an NSTableView which I am setting
up in IB. For the resizing mode, I am selecting the uniform
resizing option. I have set an autosave name for the table. Most
but not all of the table's columns can be resized. Columns can be
added and removed as needed, which I accomplish by retaining the
columns in my controller's awakeFromNib and then using starting
table view add and remove methods as needed.
When a user changes the width of a table column and the quits the
application, the table column's width is preserved, as it should
be. That is, however, only the case in 10.4. Under a 10.3.9
environment, if a user changes the width of a column and then
restarts the app, the changes are lost. Column reordering is
preserved in both 10.4 and 10.3.9, but in 10.3.9 when a column is
moved, say, from position 2 to position 1, the column takes on the
width of the column that had been in position 1.
Is there some kind of bug that prevents a table setup in 10.4 IB
from properly functioning in 10.3.9?
-Phil
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40gmail.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40gmail.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden