• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: NSObject Exercise comments?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NSObject Exercise comments?


  • Subject: RE: NSObject Exercise comments?
  • From: "Frode" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:13:07 +0100
  • Importance: Normal



-----Original Message-----
From: glenn andreas
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:54 PM
To: John Stiles
Cc: email@hidden; Andreas Mayer
Subject: Re: NSObject Exercise comments?

> Method chaining gets real confusing real quick because there's no
> clear difference between something that is using it to perform a


I rather use the special methods that returns a copy just for chaining.
:) It's like objective-c is designed for chaining, compared to c++. Even
messages to 0 is accepted for pointer returns, thus you'll never need to
check pointer validity.

Regards,
Frode


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
      • From: glenn andreas <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: NSObject Exercise comments? (From: glenn andreas <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Setting initial filename for Save As
  • Next by Date: Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
  • Previous by thread: Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
  • Next by thread: Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread