Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
- Subject: Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
- From: glenn andreas <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:43:49 -0600
On Dec 12, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Frode wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: glenn andreas
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:54 PM
To: John Stiles
Cc: email@hidden; Andreas Mayer
Subject: Re: NSObject Exercise comments?
Method chaining gets real confusing real quick because there's no
clear difference between something that is using it to perform a
I rather use the special methods that returns a copy just for
chaining.
:) It's like objective-c is designed for chaining, compared to c++.
Even
messages to 0 is accepted for pointer returns, thus you'll never
need to
check pointer validity.
Please read the (painfully long) thread about this that occurred on
comp.lang.objective-c a while back:
<
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.objective-c/browse_frm/
thread/f820c36e3a3f8050?q=chaining+group:comp.lang.objective-c&hl=en&>
Glenn Andreas email@hidden
<
http://www.gandreas.com/> wicked fun!
Widgetarium | the quickest path to widgets
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden