Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying?
Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying?
- Subject: Re: KVO one-step listening but two-step notifying?
- From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:48:23 -0800
On Dec 23, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Hamish Allan wrote:
True. I don't seem to be doing very well at coming up with
examples, but I still feel that something isn't quite right. If
it's important for me to notify observers of upcoming changes to
properties, why can't I receive such notifications myself? It seems
that this design doesn't allow for me to proxy data without copying
it.
I'm not sure I understand the problem.
mmalc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden