Re: Listening to bindings
Re: Listening to bindings
- Subject: Re: Listening to bindings
- From: Matt Neuburg <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:34:07 -0800
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:28:20 -0600, James McConnell <email@hidden>
said:
>But now in the world of bindings, all that code is taken care of with the
>Bindings system, and it has made all of our lives a whole lot easier. But
>for this application, I don't want the user to have to worry about whether
>or not s/he saved the info to the database. I want it to happen in
>real-time so the user doesn't even think about it. In order to do that, I
>need to have control, or at least access to, the code that handles modifying
>the interface to make it constantly concurrent with the database. MVC says
>this should happen with a controller. The database would represent the
>model, the interface (tables, etc.) would represent the view. So all this
>is happening in my AppController. But with bindings, I don't have access to
>the code that handles the interaction between the interface and the model.
Might it make sense to wait for Tiger and take advantage of Core Data?
<http://developer.apple.com/macosx/tiger/>
m.
--
matt neuburg, phd = email@hidden, <http://www.tidbits.com/matt/>
A fool + a tool + an autorelease pool = cool!
AppleScript: the Definitive Guide
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596005571/somethingsbymatt>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden