Re: Listening to bindings
Re: Listening to bindings
- Subject: Re: Listening to bindings
- From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:19:07 -0800
On Feb 19, 2005, at 9:34 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:28:20 -0600, James McConnell
<email@hidden>
said:
But now in the world of bindings, all that code is taken care of
with the
Bindings system, and it has made all of our lives a whole lot
easier. But
for this application, I don't want the user to have to worry about
whether
or not s/he saved the info to the database. I want it to happen in
real-time so the user doesn't even think about it. In order to do
that, I
need to have control, or at least access to, the code that handles
modifying
the interface to make it constantly concurrent with the database.
MVC says
this should happen with a controller. The database would represent
the
model, the interface (tables, etc.) would represent the view. So
all this
is happening in my AppController. But with bindings, I don't have
access to
the code that handles the interaction between the interface and the
model.
Might it make sense to wait for Tiger and take advantage of Core Data?
<http://developer.apple.com/macosx/tiger/>
I concur. This sounds like a perfect fit for Core Data.
-jcr
John C. Randolph <email@hidden> (408) 974-8819
Sr. Cocoa Software Engineer,
Apple Worldwide Developer Relations
http://developer.apple.com/cocoa/index.html
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden