Re: Binding name must be same as ivar name?
Re: Binding name must be same as ivar name?
- Subject: Re: Binding name must be same as ivar name?
- From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:35:41 +0100
On Feb 25, 2005, at 5:24 AM, Roarke Lynch wrote:
On Feb 24, 2005, at 1:44 PM, mmalcolm crawford wrote:
Binding names are the names of attributes of an object that may be
bound.
You bind an object's binding to another object using a keypath. It
is items in a keypath that can have derived values. This is a
general property of key-value coding, and dependent values is a
feature of key-value observing, both of which may find utility in
contexts other than bindings.
Are you saying that bindings should not be used for derived
properties that are peers of each other? Simple example: a sum class
No, I said that keypaths to a value are not the same thing as bindable
attributes of an object.
mmalc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden