Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper

Subject: Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:54:46 -0600

On Jan 21, 2005, at 8:09 PM, OL&L Lists wrote:

How is running an entire app authorized as root more secure then running a tiny one-shot code fragment that enters and then exits root mode momentarily?


Who on earth said anything about running an entire app as root?!

Charles

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
From: OL&L Lists <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: Bob Ippolito <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: OL&L Lists <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: John Davidorff Pell <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: OL&L Lists <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: NSNumber stringValue not returning correct value

Next by Date:
Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper

Previous by thread:
Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper

Next by thread:
Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper

Index(es):

Date
Thread