• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper


  • Subject: Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
  • From: OL&L Lists <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:11:01 -0800

At 6:33 PM -0800 1/21/05, mmalcolm crawford wrote:
On Jan 21, 2005, at 6:18 PM, OL&L Lists wrote:
Experience suggests that this thread has plenty of potential to go in directions that aren't really relevant to the list! :-) Please make sure it's kept on topic...

Writing setuid helper tools is not relevant to the Cocoa development list?

From <http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev>:

"The Cocoa Development list is for discussions regarding native Mac OS X application development using the Cocoa Frameworks: Foundation and Application Kit. Cocoa is one of the principal application environments for Mac OS X, based on advanced object oriented APIs that allow development in Java and Objective-C. Subscribers to this list discuss frameworks, features, and technical issues specific to Cocoa application development."

If one were to apply a strict literal interpretation, then since this is not "specific to Cocoa application development" then no, it's not. It is, however, of at least tangential relevance, and is likely to be of interest. What would be inappropriate (and what experience has shown is prone to happen) would be, for example, discussion of the relative merits of different security schemes on different operating systems... Please make sure that discussion is kept relevant to Cocoa/Mac OS X development.

mmalc

Trying to get people to follow Apple's recommendations for executing code as root, explaining why Apple recommends not doing the way it is done on other OSes, and making sure they read Performing Privileged Operations with Authorization Services is not relevant to Mac OS X development?


Unless of course Apple wants everyone to ignore Apple's recommendations and have everyone do security in any which way they want which will lead to unsecure software and malicious exploits. Maybe if OS X ends up like Windows with daily viruses, hacks, and exploits, the discussion will become more relevant?

Michael
Orbital Launch & Lift, Inc.
http://www.orbitallaunch.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
      • From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>)
 >[Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>)
 >[Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: OL&L Lists <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper (From: mmalcolm crawford <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
  • Next by Date: Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
  • Next by thread: Re: [Moderator] Re: Authorization without permanent setuid on helper
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread