Re: Distributed Objects and KVO/KVC
Re: Distributed Objects and KVO/KVC
- Subject: Re: Distributed Objects and KVO/KVC
- From: Julien Jalon <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:23:49 +0100
KVO itself will be supported because the observers that will really be
registered will be the DO proxies (which will get the notifications
then pass them to the original object on the other side)... only, it
surely won't correctly work as any observing stuff (KVO,
NSNotifications) or delegation because the observers and delegates are
not retained, thus, the DO proxies will likely be dealloc'ed and
become invalid.
--
Julien
On 11/16/05, James Wilson <email@hidden> wrote:
> All,
>
> We're in the processing of scoping out a coding project, and I can't
> seem to find a clear answer on a query regarding DO. Is KVO supported
> across DO? The reason I ask is for the client we'd be using bindings
> extensively and it'd be nice to have things bound in the client to
> server-side objects via DO. Any chance this is possible?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> ------------------------[ www.lithiumcorp.com ]-----
> James Wilson phone: 02 8920 8711
> CCIE #6662 mobile: 0422 22 3742
>
> LithiumCorp
> Network Design, Implementation and Management Systems
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the originator of the message and permanently delete it from your
> computer.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden