Re: adding Foundation framework to a Carbon application
Re: adding Foundation framework to a Carbon application
- Subject: Re: adding Foundation framework to a Carbon application
- From: Ed Voas <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:19:03 -0800
Agreed, though if it's mostly c++ say, stamping it .m because it
might call one NS function (or merely happen to include an objc
header) seems like a bit much. OTOH, if it were mostly objc, I'd
probably do the wholesale name change for the reasons you state.
--Ed (wondering why he cares so much about this :-))
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Chris Parker wrote:
While I really don't like file extensions as type indicators that
much in general, for development I like having the extension match
the language - I can tell immediately what the file -should- be
compiled as from the Finder or 'ls', rather than having to poke at
the project settings in Xcode to figure out what the compiler's
going to do with it.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden