Re: Useless side remark...
Re: Useless side remark...
- Subject: Re: Useless side remark...
- From: Karl Goiser <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:24:52 +1100
That's a very interesting and _not_ a useless remark to my mind.
When overriding superclass or implementing delegate methods with the
very long names that are in Cocoa, this seems like a problem. Of
course, using the completion mechanism helps a lot, but this doesn't
show you that the method/function name is somehow special, or should
be...
Maybe the Xcode people could be coaxed to specially mark method or
function names defined elsewhere?
Karl
On 22/03/2006, at 2:36 AM, Ondra Cada wrote:
Oh, by the way, just speaking of "experienced programmers". Last
four-odd hours I've spent finding why the dickens one of my classes
does not get the +initialize message. Has been pretty complex, for
the class just happens to be accessed the very first time not
directly by sending a "normal" message, but through a moderately
complicated nest of HOM-generated invocations. Nice and cosy time
with gdb, tea, and a lot of chin scratchin'.
Just the very now I've found the mysterious culprit: my method name
was spelled "initalize" :D
---
Ondra Čada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden