Re: Useless side remark...
Re: Useless side remark...
- Subject: Re: Useless side remark...
- From: "I. Savant" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:28:42 -0500
Though this is a discussion for the XCode list, I like your idea.
That would be quite a useful feature indeed!
--
I.S.
On Mar 22, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Karl Goiser wrote:
That's a very interesting and _not_ a useless remark to my mind.
When overriding superclass or implementing delegate methods with
the very long names that are in Cocoa, this seems like a problem.
Of course, using the completion mechanism helps a lot, but this
doesn't show you that the method/function name is somehow special,
or should be...
Maybe the Xcode people could be coaxed to specially mark method or
function names defined elsewhere?
Karl
On 22/03/2006, at 2:36 AM, Ondra Cada wrote:
Oh, by the way, just speaking of "experienced programmers". Last
four-odd hours I've spent finding why the dickens one of my
classes does not get the +initialize message. Has been pretty
complex, for the class just happens to be accessed the very first
time not directly by sending a "normal" message, but through a
moderately complicated nest of HOM-generated invocations. Nice and
cosy time with gdb, tea, and a lot of chin scratchin'.
Just the very now I've found the mysterious culprit: my method
name was spelled "initalize" :D
---
Ondra Čada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40gmail.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden