Re: Keeping track of CGAffineTransform's action
Re: Keeping track of CGAffineTransform's action
- Subject: Re: Keeping track of CGAffineTransform's action
- From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:59:29 -0700
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Pierre Berloquin <email@hidden> wrote:
> You are right on an efficiency point of view, except I also use other Quartz
> functions, for special text renderings for example, in view of later 3D
> treatments, and it's logically saner to remain in one programming context
> rather than shift between CGRect and Affine.Yet Apple's philosophy on the
> matter is not very clear, transfering some Quartz functions to NS objects in
> 3.0 instead of making Quartz unavoidable ...
I would beg to differ. I don't see how it makes more sense to use an
affine transform to translate content when the semantic effect is
really the translation of the view itself.
BTW, iPhone 3.0 is still under NDA, you can't talk about it here.
--Kyle Sluder
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden